The man accusing Barack Obama of using drugs in 1999 and having oral sex with him during a visit Larry Sinclair made to Chicago is willing to take a polygraph test. Whitehouse.com offered Sinclair $10,000 just to take the test. If he passes, then he will make an additional $100,000. After considering the offer, working out the logistics, and weighing the benefits of the polygraph (and the money), Sinclair has agreed to take the polygraph with one of the leading experts in polygraph tests grilling him about his tawdry Obama confessions.
Those who are interested will have the chance to watch Sinclair, live, as he takes his polygraph test, within the next ten days, on Whitehouse.com. The polygraph test could make or break Obama, who mentioned he last took drugs (snorted coke) in his youth. Sinclair claims he repeatedly contacted Obama’s camp and told him he had to come clean about using drugs in 1999. According to Sinclair, Obama used a crack pipe and got him a packet of cocaine, while the two cruised around in a limo, in the Chicago area. Sinclair also performed oral sex on Obama. The time period falls around early November of 1999.
Those who wish to find out more details can check out the website. Meanwhile, the mainstream media has been uncomfortably mum on a subject storming the web and blogs all over it. CNN, for example, is posting on how Clinton and Obama are squabbling over delegates yet not one story has been posted about Sinclair…well at least not where we can find it. In the meantime, those who aren’t computer saavy or get their news offline are still planning to vote for Obama because they are in the dark to the accusations, which could have an impact on the upcoming primaries and caucuses in Ohio, Hawaii, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Honestly, what Obama does in his bedroom is his business. I said it with Bill and I’m saying it with Barack. What is disturbing is the fact that if Sinclair’s allegations are true, Obama lied about using drugs and he not only has somewhat negative positions on GLBT Rights issues, he also has stated, as a Christian, he has some prejudices against GLBT individuals, particularly when it comes to homosexual marriage.
That being said, we may be liberal, but we still have morals. Do you want a hypocrite and a liar to be your president? We surely don’t. We guess we’ll just have to wait and see what happens with the polygraph test to know the truth.
Technorati Tags: primaries, caucuses, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair, drug use, 2008, presidential election
----------------------------
Written by - Visit Website
what is this, Jerry Spinger? Nobody’s going to believe a stupid polygraph test done by some internet tabloid even if he does pass. Everyone already thinks he’s just some dumbass trying to get attention. Polygraph tests are NOT reliable
In the interview in the Remse show Larry Sinclair gives many details about the story which don’t seem improvised. But there are also clear contradictions and several, very unlikely circumstances.
At any rate, whether or not Sinclair had sex and drugs with another man in a limousine, Sinclar gives NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that the other guy involved WAS indeed Obama. He could have been any other (perhaps African-American) man, even one with power (a politician, a businessman…). There are indications about this, not based on what Sinclair said, but based on certain things he did NOT say about “Obama”. Remse never asked him: “HOW ARE YOU SURE THE GUY WAS OBAMA?”.
So, for Sinclair it would be quite easy to semi-lie: All he had to do is call this guy “Obama”, and keep the rest of the story (more or less) intact. Once Sinclair got to convince himself (for whatever reasons) that the unknown man he did drugs with nine years ago was “Senator Obama”, the rest of the story will unfold coherently in his mind. He may even “pass” a polygraph test.
There have been almost a half million hits on UTube regarding the Larry Sinclair and Barack issue this past week. Letters have been sent to Barack, Howard Dean (DNC) and others, by Sinclair to respond. Barack has chosen not to respond (nor nip it in the bud??). The cable and other media have been asked to suppress the Larry Sinclair story and they are obliging. In a recent blog it was said that Novak is waiting to hit Barack with the “LS/BO cocaine/gay sex scandal” after a Hillary loss. If Hillary knows about this–she is taking the high road–even in the face of losing her run for the White House–and not getting involved!. But that means if Hillary loses (they will get the disgusting story out at that time) and we will surely be in we for more years of Republicans in the White House. Everyone– please demand that the story be investigated and reported by the main stream media…NOW.. to see if there is any truth to it. Let’s put an end to this truth– or– rumor!
No matter where you go you always find comments from the Obama TROLLS. I thought the RON PAUL Trolls were bad. They are so messed up and don’t even know it. Important famous people are caught in this Obama CULT. Its sad. You can’t talk sense to them. THey have to wake up on their own.
Larry Sinclair is real and he is honest.
Are you idiot, or something? First of all, Obama is 100% pro-GLBT and supports gay marriage.
Second, polygraph tests mean nothing EVEN if conducted in a proper manner (google for it, there is no good science behind the polygraphs), but they mean even less than nothing when done by a sleazy web-tabloid to boost its ratings.
Really, dude, you’re severely deluded.
I thought everyone knew that polygraphs were unreliable. That’s why the courts don’t allow them to be used as evidence anymore.
if a person rehearses and says a lie long enough he starts to believe it.
look at OJ. he’s the perfect example.
Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce?
I’ve been trying to get Mr. Sinclair to response to questions on his blog (simple ones, like “If you think Obama’s phone records would prove you right, why don’t you provide your phone records, they should work just as well, right?” ), but the blog is so heavily moderated that not one single real question can get through, and apparently even his own worshipers are now having a hard time posting due to overaggressive comment deletion.
I know several people who’ve tried to ask questions of Mr. Sinclair, but that is apparently not allowed on his blog, despite the fact that his blog clearly states “You may comment on any post, regardless of your position. However, please note that any and all abusive, threatening and vulgar comments and emails will result in your user name, email address and IP address being posted regardless and without the posters permission. You have been warned.” .
Small wonder, huh? The guy who wants to force Obama to answer his questions will not answer anyone else’s
I personally would love it if someone in the media just exposed this guy for the fraud he is. I’d watch that episode for certain, and I’m sure the advertisers would be well pleased by the number of viewers
.